Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: hsfx

August undefined, 2024

WebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … WebIt's going to take a long time before Canon will be fully transitioned from EF to RF and because of that, Canon has announced a hand-full of EF-RF mount adapters for using …

What Is The Difference Between Canon RF and EF …

Web4. FantasticGlass • 7 mo. ago. The L series RF glass handles CA and flaring better and is a bit sharper wide open. But compared to the most modern EF glass it's actually pretty close. The biggest difference I noticed was CA, the RF L glass has basically none. It's impressive. kamal the great

RF vs EF 24-70 2.8 : r/canon - reddit

WebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Go to canon r/canon • by Appropriate-Year-505. EF 70-200mm F/4 non IS vs EFs 55-250mm IS STM . How significant is the difference? A used 70-200 will be around 500€, the 55-250 can be had for as low as 200€. Are the differences really worth the 300 ... WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive around £750, according to a recent quote. The cost of a second hand R6 is around £1,900 while an R7 is around £1,400 (both including ef-rf adaptor). lawn mower drive

EF vs RF lens construction : r/canon - reddit.com

How is life with the Ef Rf adapter? : r/canon - reddit

WebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series. WebOld 'L' EF zoom lenses vs. new RF 'non-L' primes. I recently decided to get back into photography and bought a Canon RP body. It seemed like a great price point to test the waters with the hobby again; I also really liked the small form factor for a full frame sensor. I have two lenses from a past life: an EF 24-70m, 2.8 L and a EF 70-200mm 2.8L. lawn mower drive belt cross referenceWebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … kamal the elephant song

"WebHmm the specs on the 80d are decent other than crop sensor. I think the RP is a good step up - but only if it’s cos you don’t want to spend a few extra $ on the R. If you want a rugged body the canon rp is perhaps not the way to go. I played with one at the canon gallery in Osaka Japan last week. " - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Opinions on rf to ef adapter vs native rf glass. : r/canon

WebCanon and Sony prices are comparable for similar quality but Sony does have far more lower-end lenses, plus third-party lenses. Both systems adapt EF lenses well (use the Sigma MC-11 for Sony). Canon has some unique RF lenses that might push you to them. The 70-200 f2.8 is VERY compact. WebEF 70-200mm f/4 vs RF 70-200mm f/4. I've been looking into getting a 70-200mm type lens for my EOS RP. If money was no object I'd probably go with the RF versions since it seems to have some slight advantages but I found some great deals that made me question whether the EF might be the way to go. The RF F/4 goes for around 1250 euros while I ...

Did you know?

WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! WebRF vs EF 24-70 2.8. I just ordered the R6. And now am looking into a buying a 24-70 2.8. I’m in debate with myself about the following choice. The RF 24-70 or the EF 24-70 ii. The second one is regularly available as second hand and gives room for another second hand lens. But the built quality of je RF is way better.

WebI currently own the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, TS-E 17mm f/4L, and RF 70-200mm f/4L. I'd say that they all seem to have fairly similar build quality and construction materials. I certainly haven't noticed any dramatic differences when out shooting. WebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Mostly EF L lenses at the moment using the adapter. 24-70mm 2.8L II 70-200mm 2.8L II 16-35mm 2.8L III 85mm 1.4L 50mm 1.4 ... [New …

WebThe RP body would run me $899 on canon site refurbished or roughly $600 used on craigslist, etc. Lenses I'm considering for M50 as well as RP if I go that route.... RF. Rokinon 14mm f2.8 $250 NEW (B&H) Canon 50mm f1.8 $200 NEW (Canon) Canon 35mm f1.8 $400 REFURB (Canon) Canon 24-105mm f4 $880 REFURB (Canon) EF-M WebWhat’s the quality difference like between the new RF lenses and the old EF lenses? Will clients likely notice the difference? 0 comments 50% Upvoted Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up Sort by: best no comments yet Be the first to share what you think! More posts from the canon community 291 Posted by u/ImaHazardtoSociety

WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago

WebAll three have Image Stabilization, including the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, where the corresponding EF lenses do not. "And the third lens in the trinity, the Canon RF 70 … lawn mower drive bar fixWebRF 35mm 1.8 vs RF 16mm 2.8? Hey everyone I'm in a debate with myself about these two lens. So I currently have a Canon EOS R with 24-105mm F4 L USM. I want to get the 35mm F1.8 for night, street, Astro, full body portraits with blurry background. It's also on sale at the moment of $300 instead of $400. My dad the other day said he wants to get ... kamal the singerWebIn the image quality comparison equalized at f/4, the two lenses are similar overall, with each having some advantages at specific focal lengths. The f/4 lens has stronger geometric distortion and has stronger lateral CA. The f/2.8 has stronger peripheral shading in most equalized comparisons. kamal thomas st john virgin islandsWebThe RF 24-105 f4 is larger and heavier, but optically superior, aside from the constant f4 maximum aperture. It is weather sealed and has both a control and focus ring. The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is small and light and forms a very small fullframe package combined with the RP. The tradeoffs of the f4-7.1 are: lawn mower drive belt installationWebRF lenses have to be placed much closer to the sensor than EF, so if you have a mirrorless RF body you can adapt EF lenses to it, but there's no way to do this in reverse (you'd have to somehow jam the lenses almost an extra inch into your camera.) 3 kickstand • 21 days ago EF or EF-S lenses only. Not RF, not EF-M, not the old Canon FD. 2 kamal thompsonWebJun 6, 2024 · The Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens - an optical masterpiece. Neat 6 minutes video by BorrowLenses telling differences between Canon’s RF mount for mirrorless cameras and EF mount for … lawn mower drive belt burningWebEF 100-400 II vs. RF 100-500. I recently picked up an R6 Mark ii and I’ve been trying to decide which lens to buy out of these two. I’m going to be using these primarily for wildlife, which I don’t have much experience with, but I’ve heard so many different opinions about which lens is better. lawn mower drive belt slipping